https://passimai.com/litigation/ 2026-11-10T00:00:00Z Passim https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-09602-project-rousseau-inc-v-david-j-venturella/#2026-11-10-74527e3481 2026-11-10T00:00:00Z

The docket records a Proposed Scheduling Order as ECF 31 on the deadline set by ECF 21. Its proposed dates and any court adoption remain unverified. A proposed order is a party filing, not a ruling.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-09602-project-rousseau-inc-v-david-j-venturella/#2026-11-09-947badcfc6 2026-11-09T00:00:00Z

The docket records ECF 26 as an amended complaint filed November 9, the deadline set by ECF 21. The full pleading and whether it satisfies the required joinder, individual facts and venue allegations remain unverified. Filing an amended complaint does not grant a preliminary injunction or expand the TRO.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-09602-project-rousseau-inc-v-david-j-venturella/#2026-11-09-5cca529bc3 2026-11-09T00:00:00Z

ECF 26 names four John Does and two Jane Does alongside Project Rousseau and supplies individual and venue allegations. It seeks relief under the APA, Accardi doctrine, Fifth Amendment and INA/FARRA concerning removals through Pakistan. These are pleaded claims; the filing does not expand the existing five-person TRO or establish that the court accepted the pleading as sufficient.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cadc-25-5243-refugee-and-immigrant-center-for-education-and-legal-services-v-noem/#2026-11-09-6e0bf46b31 2026-11-09T00:00:00Z

The Supreme Court docket records distribution for the November 13, 2026 conference. The entry does not grant or deny certiorari.

https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/tps-terminations/#status-2026-11-06-in_effect 2026-11-06T00:00:00Z

November 3 order withdrew the October 30 stay denial and granted a 14-day administrative stay beginning with issuance of the Supreme Court judgment on November 6.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-09602-project-rousseau-inc-v-david-j-venturella/#2026-11-06-aa741c0969 2026-11-06T00:00:00Z

ECF 21 grants the TRO motion in part and bars removal of the clients identified by Project Rousseau and in ECF 16 to Pakistan, Afghanistan or any other third country until further order. It requires one week’s notice of removal plans, an amended complaint joining the clients with individual and venue facts by November 9 at 11:59 p.m., and a proposed preliminary-injunction briefing schedule by November 10 at 5 p.m. It certifies no class and enters no final merits judgment.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-09602-project-rousseau-inc-v-david-j-venturella/#2026-11-05-83ac75067d 2026-11-05T00:00:00Z

The docket records the government’s TRO opposition, ECF 15, and Deportation Officer Imani Montgomery’s declaration, ECF 16. The November 6 order identifies five clients discussed in that declaration. These filings do not themselves determine whether removal is lawful.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-11-05-f3ef685815 2026-11-05T00:00:00Z

The panel granted consolidation of appeals 25-5724 and 26-187 and directed the supplemental briefs ordered November 3 to discuss issues in both appeals. The signed order is dated November 5; the district docket records ECF 503 on November 6. It does not decide the merits or change the administrative stay.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-25a999-fritz-emmanuel-lesly-miot-v-trump/#2026-11-04-7f3aeb4fd5 2026-11-04T00:00:00Z

The minute order partially grants ECF 153, denies magistrate referral and requires two in-person meet-and-confer sessions before defendants oppose ECF 150. If disputes persist, defendants may file by December 18, 2026 and plaintiffs may respond by January 15, 2027. It does not decide the judgment motion or reinstate TPS.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca1-25-2152-26-1094-guerrero-orellana-v-moniz/#2026-11-04-f7c1861bfa 2026-11-04T00:00:00Z

ECF 218 sets a remote hearing on ECF 214 for November 12, 2026 at 2:30 p.m. before Judge Patti B. Saris. The notice schedules argument; it does not grant reconsideration or alter the transfer-notice order.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-09602-project-rousseau-inc-v-david-j-venturella/#2026-11-03-9cf719404a 2026-11-03T00:00:00Z

ECF 8 requires adherence to ICE’s representations of no planned or confirmed Afghan removal flights to Afghanistan or Pakistan during the TRO and that arrangements take weeks. Entered at 1:33 p.m. Eastern, it expires November 7 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern unless extended or dissolved. Defendants’ response is due November 5 at 9 a.m.; no security is required. It is not a final merits ruling.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-11-03-b4cfaa9a07 2026-11-03T00:00:00Z

The panel grants a 14-day administrative stay beginning when the Supreme Court’s judgment issues on November 6, 2026, and withdraws its prior order denying the government’s stay request, appellate Dkt. 94. Expedited merits briefing will be set separately. This is interim procedural relief, not a merits decision.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca1-25-2152-26-1094-guerrero-orellana-v-moniz/#2026-11-03-6696f2dac5 2026-11-03T00:00:00Z

ECF 217 records Guerrero Orellana’s opposition to defendants’ ECF 214 motion for reconsideration of ECF 212. This is a party filing, not a ruling on reconsideration.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-09602-project-rousseau-inc-v-david-j-venturella/#2026-11-02-8fbb912118 2026-11-02T00:00:00Z

The docket records ECF 4 requesting temporary relief against removal of plaintiff’s clients to Pakistan or Afghanistan. A motion is a request, not a ruling.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-09602-project-rousseau-inc-v-david-j-venturella/#2026-11-02-6a7e0f3892 2026-11-02T00:00:00Z

ECF 1 alleges that sending Afghan clients to Pakistan for onward removal to Afghanistan violates DHS third-country-removal guidance, the APA and due process under the Accardi doctrine. Plaintiff requests injunctive and declaratory relief; allegations about diplomatic assurances and danger are not court findings.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-10-30-e9bbfc4080 2026-10-30T00:00:00Z

After the Supreme Court remand, the panel denied the government’s stay motion and alternative request for an administrative stay of at least 21 days. The order says the Supreme Court’s current stay expires with its mandate on November 6 and provides for a separate expedited merits schedule.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-26-cv-11201-african-communities-together-v-noem/#2026-10-28-50a3690c09 2026-10-28T00:00:00Z

The brief identifies First Circuit 26-1930 as plaintiffs’ appeal from D. Mass. 1:26-cv-11201 and urges reversal of the denial of emergency relief. It is dated October 26; its certificate states electronic filing and service on October 28. The brief does not grant relief.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-28-056c6846b4 2026-10-28T00:00:00Z

Text-only ECF 144, filed October 28, records denial of the motion to stay proceedings, ECF 133. It concerns continued district litigation and does not stay the preliminary relief. Its conference and deadline text is internally inconsistent; no new scheduling date is established here.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-6842-rodriguez-vazquez-v-bostock/#2026-10-28-b67953d2cb 2026-10-28T00:00:00Z

The government asks the Court to hold the petition pending Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha, No. 26-104. The official docket sets a November 30 response deadline; review has not been granted.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca2-25-3141-cunha-v-freden/#2026-10-28-b46bcd8a1c 2026-10-28T00:00:00Z

The Court granted an extension: the joint appendix and petitioner’s merits brief are due November 30, 2026, and the respondent’s merits brief is due January 13, 2027. This scheduling order does not decide the detention question.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-26-c1332d44d6 2026-10-26T00:00:00Z

ECF 34 (reply in support of both motions) and ECF 35 (amended complaint).

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-10676-d-v-d-v-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/#2026-10-23-dae443e919 2026-10-23T00:00:00Z

The Supreme Court docket records submission of the government’s opening merits brief and joint appendix. The brief challenges jurisdiction, classwide relief, and the ruling against the third-country-removal guidance; it is not a Court decision.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-23-7b300e7c51 2026-10-23T00:00:00Z

A minute order directs the parties to appear on November 12, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. for a hearing on the classwide preliminary-injunction and class-certification motions.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca5-26-50183-26-50219-26-50221-ignacio-sosnava-rodriguez-v-sylvester-ortega-alejandro-villegas-angel-v-markwayne-mullin-miguel-angel-gomez-alvarado-v-miguel-vergara/#2026-10-23-427d05b1b5 2026-10-23T00:00:00Z

The court rejected the three petitioners’ due-process claims concerning bond hearings and detention duration under section 1225(b)(2)(A), reversed the judgments, vacated habeas relief, and directed the mandate to issue immediately.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-21-9492b80879 2026-10-21T00:00:00Z

ECF 24 (preliminary injunction) and ECF 25 (class certification).

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-10-21-febbe51455 2026-10-21T00:00:00Z

The ECF 496 filing notice confirms that the second amended complaint drops the two Haiti termination APA claims and excludes the three rejected new claims. It states that the APA claims on appeal are unchanged and combines the existing equal-protection claims as Claim 4. This is a pleading update, not a new grant of relief.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-25a999-fritz-emmanuel-lesly-miot-v-trump/#2026-10-20-b7e3bef63b 2026-10-20T00:00:00Z

ECF 152 seeks judgment for defendants on all claims after the Supreme Court remand. It is a party’s request, not a ruling dismissing the case or restoring Haiti TPS.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-02103-1-26-cv-02280-noor-doe-v-noem-abdo-doe-v-noem/#2026-10-20-990938889e 2026-10-20T00:00:00Z

The endorsed order holds the government’s interlocutory-appeal and discovery-stay requests in abeyance and directs an October 30 joint letter proposing how litigation should proceed, including any summary-judgment schedule and briefing of record or discovery disputes.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca1-25-2152-26-1094-guerrero-orellana-v-moniz/#2026-10-20-242e7749af 2026-10-20T00:00:00Z

ECF 214 asks under Rules 59(e) and 60(b) for reconsideration of the September 22 order’s transfer-notice requirement. Plaintiffs oppose the request; this motion does not establish that the court granted relief.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-26-49-brenna-bird-v-iowa-migrant-movement-for-justice/#2026-10-19-1aaae3ec31 2026-10-19T00:00:00Z

The Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in No. 26-49. The order does not grant certiorari or change the injunction against Iowa's law.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cacd-2-26-cv-12026-state-of-california-v-u-s-immigration-and-customs-enforcement/#2026-10-15-3421ca9be2 2026-10-15T00:00:00Z

The complaint alleges APA and Tenth Amendment violations and seeks declaratory relief, vacatur of the operative courthouse-enforcement directive, and injunctions, including against civil immigration arrests at California courts. These are requested remedies.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-10-15-698b8919a0 2026-10-15T00:00:00Z

In DktEntry 90.1, plaintiffs argued that prior circuit precedent on TPS vacatur authority survives Mullin v. Doe, disputed mootness, and opposed a stay on equitable grounds. This is a filed opposition, not a ruling on the stay or restoration of TPS.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-10-14-b6ac4cbea0 2026-10-14T00:00:00Z

ECF 487 allows plaintiffs to eliminate the APA challenges to the July and November 2025 Haiti TPS terminations but denies leave to add proposed due-process, bare-animus equal-protection, and ultra vires claims as futile. It sets a November 17 status conference and does not restore TPS.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-26-49-brenna-bird-v-iowa-migrant-movement-for-justice/#2026-10-13-d3a46af820 2026-10-13T00:00:00Z

The official docket records distribution for the October 16, 2026 conference after October 8 rescheduling. This is a scheduling entry, not a grant or denial of certiorari.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca11-25-14065-25-14075-fidencio-hernandez-alvarez-v-warden-federal-detention-center-miami-ismael-cerro-perez-v-assistant-field-office-director/#2026-10-13-c57917c04d 2026-10-13T00:00:00Z

The court ordered that the petition for rehearing en banc is held in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha, No. 26-104.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca5-26-10925-abasse-gakou-v-warden-of-the-prairieland-detention-center/#2026-10-10-d4bf99a89a 2026-10-10T00:00:00Z

In a published order, the panel denied both stays sought to prevent removal to Sierra Leone. It concluded that section 1252(g) barred entertaining the stay motion and that Gakou had not demonstrated a meaningful probability of success, without considering the other three stay factors.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-25a952-dahlia-doe-v-noem/#2026-10-09-3a2c6ac709 2026-10-09T00:00:00Z

ECF 100 replies in support of defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment. No subsequent ruling on the remand cross-motions appears in the reviewed public docket.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-09-bd9a597827 2026-10-09T00:00:00Z

ECF 12 and 13. These are the plaintiffs' requests; the court hasn't ruled.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-09-cd11459693 2026-10-09T00:00:00Z

The court assigned appeal 26-6667 from district case 4:25-cv-08454-HSG. Its October 9 time-schedule notice sets the opening brief for November 6, 2026, the answering brief for December 4, and an optional reply within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The notice does not grant a stay.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-09-c509794f09 2026-10-09T00:00:00Z

Defendants requested a stay of further district proceedings or alternative 30-day extensions. Their motion states that the existing vacatur would remain in place during the requested stay; this filing does not establish a court ruling.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-09-384add7603 2026-10-09T00:00:00Z

Defendants filed notice of an appeal to the Ninth Circuit from the September 30 order granting preliminary relief in part. The notice does not itself stay that order.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-26-49-brenna-bird-v-iowa-migrant-movement-for-justice/#2026-10-08-ba3ee8a327 2026-10-08T00:00:00Z

The Supreme Court docket marks the petition rescheduled after its October 5 distribution for the October 9 conference. It does not list a replacement conference date or grant or deny review.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cadc-25-5243-refugee-and-immigrant-center-for-education-and-legal-services-v-noem/#2026-10-07-a20b51b76c 2026-10-07T00:00:00Z

The Supreme Court docket records distribution for the November 6, 2026 conference. This scheduling entry does not grant or deny certiorari.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-02103-1-26-cv-02280-noor-doe-v-noem-abdo-doe-v-noem/#2026-10-06-d9a9d00b27 2026-10-06T00:00:00Z

The opinion and order, Noor ECF 71 / Abdo ECF 114, dismisses all claims except intentional discrimination, with prejudice as to the dismissed claims; denies Abdo plaintiffs’ second preliminary-injunction motion; and lifts the litigation stays. It does not restore the vacated TPS postponement or decide the surviving discrimination claims.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cadc-25-5243-refugee-and-immigrant-center-for-education-and-legal-services-v-noem/#2026-10-06-e2bbc76408 2026-10-06T00:00:00Z

The government urged Supreme Court review and reversal of the D.C. Circuit asylum-access ruling. Alternatively, it suggested holding the petition pending DHS v. D.V.D., No. 26-426, and then granting review. These are party requests, not a Court ruling.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca1-25-2152-26-1094-guerrero-orellana-v-moniz/#2026-10-06-4c74cb3d7e 2026-10-06T00:00:00Z

District ECF 213 records the First Circuit mandate concerning the two appeals; the docket entry was entered October 7. This does not terminate the district implementation proceedings.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-26-49-brenna-bird-v-iowa-migrant-movement-for-justice/#2026-10-05-b2eb91935d 2026-10-05T00:00:00Z

The official docket records distribution for the October 9, 2026 conference following September 28 rescheduling; the petition remains pending.

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-10-05-5e11df3310 2026-10-05T00:00:00Z

The Court granted the petition in No. 26-48, vacated the Ninth Circuit judgment, and remanded for further consideration in light of Mullin v. Doe, 609 U.S. 324 (2026).

https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/detention-without-bond/#status-2026-10-01-varies_by_circuit 2026-10-01T00:00:00Z

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in No. 26-104

https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-10-01-5b2bc14511 2026-10-01T00:00:00Z

ECF 235 asks the court to find violations of the November 25, 2025 preliminary injunction at 630 Sansome Street and to order compliance plans and reporting; it is noticed for hearing on November 5, 2026. This is plaintiffs' request; the court hasn't ruled.