<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/refugee-admissions/</id>
  <title>Suspension of refugee admissions and processing · Passim litigation</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/refugee-admissions/"/>
  <updated>2026-09-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>Passim</name></author>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-1939-pacito-v-trump/#2026-09-04-be3af821fa</id>
    <title>Pacito v. Trump: Government replied in support of discovery-stay motion</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.344495/gov.uscourts.wawd.344495.224.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 224 supports the pending ECF 221 request. The reply is a filing, not a ruling on discovery or the merits.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-1939-pacito-v-trump/#2026-08-21-603cd3e3be</id>
    <title>Pacito v. Trump: Government sought a new stay of discovery</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.344495/gov.uscourts.wawd.344495.221.0_1.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-08-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 221 requests a stay until resolution of defendants’ dismissal motion and an answer to the first amended complaint. This is a motion, not an order staying discovery.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-1939-pacito-v-trump/#2026-08-04-a69d4ec6dc</id>
    <title>Pacito v. Trump: Court denied government’s original protective-order motion</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.344495/gov.uscourts.wawd.344495.219.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-08-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 219 denies ECF 188, which sought relief from responding to plaintiffs’ discovery requests. The order permits extra-record discovery; it does not resolve the amended complaint or restore refugee admissions.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-1939-pacito-v-trump/#2026-08-03-d682ed15c0</id>
    <title>Pacito v. Trump: District court adopted a contingent discovery and trial schedule</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/washington/wawdce/2:2025cv00255/344495/218/0.pdf?ts=1785869274"/>
    <updated>2026-08-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 218 grants the stipulated scheduling motion and replaces fixed dates with deadlines running from the later of the ruling on defendants' protective-order motion or defendants' answer to the first amended complaint. Bench trial begins 306 days after that Order Date; the order does not itself establish a calendar trial date.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-1939-pacito-v-trump/#2026-03-05-bc5b4cd02e</id>
    <title>Pacito v. Trump: Ninth Circuit narrowed refugee-admissions injunction but preserved domestic resettlement relief</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/03/05/25-1939.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-03-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The panel largely upheld the administration's suspension of refugee admissions and overseas processing, but it kept preliminary relief in place for domestic resettlement services owed to refugees already admitted to the United States.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-1939-pacito-v-trump/#2026-02-06-2ad2769552</id>
    <title>Pacito v. Trump: District court set bench trial for September 8, 2026</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.344495/gov.uscourts.wawd.344495.187.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-02-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>While the Ninth Circuit appeal was pending, the district court scheduled a bench trial for September 8, 2026.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/refugee-admissions/#status-2025-09-12-in_effect</id>
    <title>Suspension of refugee admissions and processing: Admissions suspension in effect</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/refugee-admissions/"/>
    <updated>2025-09-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Ninth Circuit stayed the preliminary injunctions pending appeal except the domestic resettlement relief; it affirmed that split on March 5, 2026</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
