Cases · No-bond detention for people who entered without inspection
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz
Latest development
Classwide bond relief affirmed; district transfer-notice order faces reconsideration
The First Circuit’s affirmance remains the statutory basis for classwide bond-hearing rights. District ECF 206 stays Counts II–IV and dismisses Count V; ECF 212 requires transfer notice and revised class notices. Guerrero Orellana opposed reconsideration in ECF 217. ECF 218 sets the ECF 214 hearing for November 12; no disposition appears in the reviewed docket.
- Status as of
- November 4, 2026
- Source
- Latest order (PDF)
- Docket reviewed through
- November 9, 2026
About the case
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz is nationally important because it adds a First Circuit classwide ruling to the fast-moving split over DHS's 2025 policy of treating long-time interior arrestees as mandatory-detention applicants for admission. The court affirmed relief for Guerrero Orellana and the certified Massachusetts class, holding that section 1226(a) governs detention and release eligibility because class members are not currently seeking admission for purposes of section 1225(b)(2)(A). On September 15, 2026, the district court stayed the due-process counts and dismissed the separate APA claim seeking vacatur of Matter of Yajure Hurtado, without disturbing the existing statutory judgment. Its September 22 order requires at least 72 hours’ notice before transferring a class member who has requested a bond hearing outside the First Circuit, and replaces the class notice. The government moved on October 20 to reconsider the transfer-notice requirement; that motion is a request, not an order changing it.
Relief
The petitioner and class sought release or bond hearings rather than detention without bond under section 1225(b)(2)(A). ECF 212 additionally requires notice to the class member, the member’s attorney if known, and class counsel at least 72 hours before an intended transfer outside the First Circuit of a class member who requests a bond hearing.
What's next
November 12, 2026 at 2:30 p.m.: remote hearing on defendants’ ECF 214 motion to reconsider the transfer-notice requirement.
New on the docket, not yet reviewed
Nothing new since the last review.
Reviewed events
Court set November 12 reconsideration hearing
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz · 1st Cir. · Source
Class representative opposed transfer-notice reconsideration
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz · 1st Cir. · Source
Government sought reconsideration of transfer-notice requirement
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz · 1st Cir. · Source
First Circuit mandate recorded in district court
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz · 1st Cir. · Source
Court required 72-hour notice of specified transfers and revised class notices
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz · 1st Cir. · Source
Court stayed constitutional counts and dismissed separate APA vacatur claim
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz · 1st Cir. · Source
First Circuit affirmed classwide detention relief
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz · 1st Cir. · Source
District court granted classwide section 1226(a) relief
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz · 1st Cir. · Source
District court ordered release or bond hearing for Guerrero Orellana
Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz · 1st Cir. · Source